Skip to main content

Back in the saddle


It's amazing what a trip to the Stanley Cup Final can stir up in you. No, I personally didn't get to any Final games this year (yet...), but damn if it didn't get the sports writer in me fired up - which is why, you could say, I'm writing this today.

I find it comical and equally unsettling that it's been almost eight years since I updated this blog. Mostly I forgot about it, but also life happened as it often does.

That being said, I've been feeling the need to sit down and write (whether about the Bruins or otherwise), and the biggest buzzkill is updating this blog to reflect everything that has changed in my life since 2011. So, this is what you get.

Yes, my name changed to Biz Durling (married to my husband Ryan for 4 years now!), I no longer give a damn about the New York Yankees, and deep down, sports writing will always remain my passion.

Good? Now that we've cleared that up, let's move on.

STANLEY CUP FINAL

First Cup Final since 2013 and what a cast of characters the Bruins have this year. From young talent to more seasoned vets, this year's melting pot of players has created a synergy and balance of skill that has led them to the most coveted place in sports - the Stanley Cup Final. Let's break down a couple of the key player findings so far this series:

  • Brad Marchand, a 100 point regular season forward, who, so far this Final against St. Louis has put up a mere three points (1g, 2a) in five games and earned a measly -3 +/- rating.
  • Tuukka Rask, a rockstar goaltender (.937 sv% in the playoffs) who also extra'd as a football blocking sled to the Blues for the first couple games of the series. 
  • Zdeno Chara, a 42-year-old, broken-jaw'd, behemoth defenseman who WILL play, swollen face be damned. 

While those are just some of the blatant headlines of the series, there are some less subtle trends that are causing just as much of a stir. If there's one thing this series against the Blues has done, it's either highlighted the injuries the Bruins have encountered this post-season, or has exposed just how bad they look against a team that forces them into a much slower, much more physical game.


To put it into perspective, last night's Game 5 at the Garden yielded only three total goals, none of which came from the "Big Four" - David Krejci, Brad Marchand, Patrice Bergeron, or David Pastrnak. In fact those four have combined for a dismal two points in the last two playoff games - both which ended up in Bruins losses.

Perhaps even more alarming is how much the Bruins weren't able to do the things right that they've been doing all season. Nevermind the tape-to-tape passes they've nearly perfected all year, but mainly the small things like battles against the boards, and even faceoffs. In Game 5, the Bruins won a mere 40% of faceoffs, with David Krejci being the main offender, winning just 4 of the 17 he squared off on (24%).

So, what's the deal? Either everyone is hurt and they are literally muscling through what they can, or the Blues just have their number. I've never seen Marchand so timid of taking a hit, nor the entire defense turn over so many possessions or get thwacked before reaching the offensive blue line so often.

Whatever the reason, they need to watch some tape, ice some joints and figure it out, preferably by puck drop on Sunday. Enterprise Center is going to be loud, but the pressure is going to be on for the Blues. They will be without forward Ivan Barbashev (currently serving a 1 game suspension), and they will have the whole city of St. Louis past and present riding on their shoulders.

Seems like a good a time as any to disappoint a thirsty fan base, don't ya think?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I find it funny that my last couple of entries have been all about lamenting or cursing and even a rare complaint (HA!). And while that fuels the passion for my writing, I feel like I should try and lean towards the lighter side of life. But that ain’t happening today. Sike! Instead, today I would like to talk about how to tell the difference between a sports fan and someone who watches sports. It might sound very simple: for example, some might believe a sports fan is one who watches every game, keeps track of stats and may even throw in a chest bump or two following an impossible catch out in center field. On the other hand, someone who watches sports is the person who just watches for the social aspect of sports, doesn’t know a touchdown from a free throw or why people laugh when talking about Plaxico Burress and the gun safety class he facilitates for community service. And while those are all good and valid points, both types of spectators have their weak links, or those people
1 comment
Read more

UMaine--more than just woods and moose.

Another Monday, which means another look back at this weekend's games in Hockey East. There have been a number of returns from last week, and some that might surprise you, but sit back and enjoy this week's edition of "The Good, the Bad, and the NO WAY!" THE GOOD: UNIVERSITY OF MAINE BLACK BEARS --The tweets were remarkable Friday night as the score between Maine and North Dakota climbed and climbed until finally it rested at 7-3. And yes, Maine did win. Now, we knew this team was good, but that good? The Black Bears finished their weekend with a sweep against NoDak, winning again on Saturday 4-2. They now are outscoring their opponents 28-17--that’s averaging almost five goals per game. WHO’S HOT : Well, truth be told, the entire team. There are only THREE members on the entire roster that have a minus rating on the ice. Three. That puts the team at a remarkable +28 overall. To put that in perspective, the undefeated Boston University Terriers only have a team total
Post a Comment
Read more